Data from the 2000 Census offer detailed information on New York City, enabling users to paint statistical portraits in a number of ways. Information is presented in the following sections:
Profiles of Census characteristics provide a large number of data items for various geographic areas. For example, the Socioeconomic Profiles provide six pages of characteristics that include high school graduates, median family income, and percent below poverty, as part of a profile that is displayed separately for each Community District.
Tables of Census characteristics provide detailed data on all income categories for persons in all 59 Community Districts is presented in a single table" to "detailed data on all income categories for persons in all 59 Community Districts are presented in a single table.
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 1990 and 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Total Population by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Population Under 18 Years by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 1990 and 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Under 18 Years by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Population 18 Years and Over by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Nonhispanic Population of Two or More Races, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Population by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin and Total Housing Units, 1990 and 2000 | ![]() |
![]() 2003 City Council Districts |
||
Population 18 Years and Over by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin, 1990 and 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Change in Total Population, 1990 to 2000, and Persons per Acre in 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Population Change for the 25 Largest Cities in the U.S., 1990 to 2000 Ranked by Population in 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Change for the New York Metropolitan Region, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() 31 Counties in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut |
|||
Total Population by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin and Total Housing Units, 2000 | New York City Census Blocks, 2000 ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
|||
Total Population by Mutually Exclusive Race and Hispanic Origin and Total Housing Units | New York City ZIPCODES, 2000![]() ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population by 5 Year Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Females by 5 Year Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Males by 5 Year Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Population 21 Years and Under by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Females 21 Years and Under by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]()
|
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Males 21 Years and Under by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Population 60 Years of Age and Over by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Females 60 Years of Age and Over by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Males 60 Years of Age and Over by Selected Age Groups, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Population by Household Relationship and Group Quarters, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Households by Household and Family Type, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
NOTE: Tables SF1 P-6A through P-6I are provided for the user to create unique age groupings by race for New York City and its boroughs. Each race group is a separate worksheet in one Excel file. Tables for total population and eight mutually exclusive race and Hispanic groups are available in the nine worksheets listed below.
|
||||
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population by Single Years of Age and Sex - 2000 | ![]() through P-6I |
NOTE: Tables SF1 P-7A through P-7E are provided for the user to create unique age groupings for New York City ZIPCODES. Each race group is a separate Excel file. Tables for total population and four mutually exclusive race and Hispanic groups are available in the five files listed below. | ||||
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population by Single Years of Age and Sex | ![]() New York City ZIPCODES, 2000 |
|||
White (Alone) Nonhispanic Population by Single Years of Age and Sex | ![]() New York City ZIPCODES, 2000 |
|||
Black (Alone) Nonhispanic Population by Single Years of Age and Sex | ![]() (Excel 297k): New York City ZIPCODES, 2000 |
|||
Asian (Alone) Nonhispanic Population by Single Years of Age and Sex | ![]() New York City ZIPCODES, 2000 |
|||
Hispanic Population by Single Years of Age and Sex | ![]() New York City ZIPCODES, 2000 |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Hispanic Population by Selected Subgroups Part 1 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Hispanic Population by Selected Subgroups Part 2 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Asian Population by Selected Subgroups | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
NOTE: Tables SF1 P-111 through P-115B: Population by Mutually Exclusive Race, Sex, and Age Census data for mutually exclusive race by sex and age are not available at the census block level. Census tract data had to be allocated in order to accurately portray the actual boundaries of community districts. Therefore, totals may not match community district data in other SF1 tables obtained by aggregating census blocks. For further information, refer to 2000 Census Community District Geography Table G-7. | ||||
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population by Age | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Females by Age | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Males by Age | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total White Nonhispanics by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
White Nonhispanic Females by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
White Nonhispanic Males by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Black Nonhispanics by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Black Nonhispanic Females by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Black Nonhispanic Males by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Asian Nonhispanics by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Asian Nonhispanic Females by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Asian Nonhispanic Males by Age (Single Race) | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Hispanics by Age | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Hispanic Females by Age | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Hispanic Males by Age | ![]() ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Occupied Housing Units by Household Size | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and Age of Householder | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment for the Population 25 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
School Enrollment by Level of School and Type of School for Population 3 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Persons 16 to 19 Years Who are Not Enrolled in School and Not High School Graduates by Labor Force Status, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Household Income in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - 2003 NYC Council Districts ![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
Family Income in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
Nonfamily Household Income in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Employment Status for the Population 16 Years and Over by Sex, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation by Sex, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 3 |
![]() Part 1 of 3 ![]() Part 1 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Female Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation, 2000 | ![]() Part 2 of 3 |
![]() Part 2 of 3 ![]() Part 2 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Male Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation, 2000 | ![]() Part 3 of 3 |
![]() Part 3 of 3 ![]() Part 3 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Industry by Sex, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Industry, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 3 |
![]() Part 1 of 3 ![]() Part 1 of 3 : BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Female Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Industry, 2000 | ![]() Part 2 of 3 |
![]() Part 2 of 3 ![]() Part 2 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Male Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Industry, 2000 | ![]() Part 3 of 3 |
![]() Part 3 of 3 ![]() Part 3 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Class of Worker by Sex, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Total Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Class of Worker, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 3 |
![]() Part 1 of 3 ![]() Part 1 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Female Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Class of Worker, 2000 | ![]() Part 2 of 3 |
![]() Part 2 of 3 ![]() Part 2 of 3 : BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Male Employed Civilian Population 16 Years and Over by Class of Worker, 2000 | ![]() Part 3 of 3 |
![]() Part 3 of 3 ![]() Part 3 of 3 : BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over by Place of Work - Persons Employed at Work During the Week Prior to Enumeration, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over by Means of Transportation to Work - Persons Employed at Work During the Week Prior to Enumeration, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Persons at Work in New York City by Place of Residence - Persons 16 Years and Over Employed at Work During the Week Prior to Enumeration, 1990 and 2000 |
![]() |
|||
New York City Residents by Place of Work - Persons 16 Years and Over Employed During the Week Prior to Enumeration, 1990 and 2000 | ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Persons for Whom Poverty Status is Determined by Poverty Rate in 1999 by Age, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Persons for Whom Poverty Status is Determined by Ratio of Income in 1999 to Poverty Level, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
Poverty Status in 1999 of Families by Presence of Related Children, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Country of Birth for the Foreign-born Population, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 2 ![]() Part 2 of 2 |
![]() Part 1 of 2 ![]() Part 1 of 2: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI ![]() Part 2 of 2 ![]() Part 2 of 2: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Year of Entry for the Foreign-born Population, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
First and Second Ancestry Reported by Selected Subgroups, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 2 ![]() Part 2 of 2 |
![]() Part 1 of 2 ![]() Part 1 of 2: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI ![]() Part 2 of 2 ![]() Part 2 of 2: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Language Spoken at Home for the Population 5 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() Part 1 of 3 |
![]() Part 1 of 3 ![]() Part 1 of 3: BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes |
Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
![]() - Zip Codes ![]() - Zip Codes |
2000 Census Special Tabulation - Language Other Than English Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over - This unique file was created by the U.S. Census Bureau at the request of NYC Department of City Planning to meet the need for information on the English language proficiency of specific language groups. (The standard Census Bureau files provide data on English language proficiency for four broad language groups only.) The totals vary from the totals shown in our Socioeconomic Tables SF3 SB P-4 and P-5 and, SF3 SB P-301 and P-302. To protect confidentiality, the data have been rounded by the Census Bureau per the instructions of their Disclosure Review Board. As a result, the sum of the categories "Speaks English Very Well," and "Speaks English Not Very Well" may not add exactly to the total "Population 5 Years and Over." | ![]() |
![]() ![]()
![]()
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
Residence in 1995 for Population 5 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Grandparents as Caregivers - Grandparents Living with and Responsible for Own Grandchildren Under 18 Years, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Population by Citizenship Status | ![]() 2003 NYC Council Districts |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Building Characteristics: | ||||
Total Housing Units and Vacant Housing Units by Number of Units in Structure, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Occupied and Renter-occupied Housing Units by Number of Units in Structure, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Total Housing Units and Vacant Housing Units by Year Structure Built, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units and Renter-occupied Housing Units by Year Structure Built, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Housing Units by Year Structure Built, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Housing Units and Vacant Housing Units by Number of Rooms, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units and Renter-occupied Housing Units by Number of Rooms, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Housing Units by Number of Rooms, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Occupancy Characteristics: | ||||
Total Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Year Householder Moved into Unit and Tenure, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Year Householder Moved into Unit, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Occupied Housing Units and Renter-occupied Housing Units by Household Size, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Household Size, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Occupants Per Room and Tenure, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Occupants per Room, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Age of Householder, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Economic Characteristics: | ||||
Specified Renter-occupied Housing Units by Gross Rent, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Specified Renter-occupied Housing Units by Gross Rent, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Gross Rent as a Percent of Household Income in 1999 for Specified Renter-occupied Housing Units, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
![]() ![]() |
|
Specified Owner-occupied Housing Units by Value, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Selected Monthly Owner Costs as a Percent of Household Income in 1999 For Specified Owner-occupied Housing Units, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Selected Monthly Owner Costs for Specified Owner-occupied Housing Units with a Mortgage, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
|||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Vehicles Available and Tenure, 2000 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() BX, BK, MN, QN, SI |
||
Total Occupied Housing Units by Vehicles Available and Telephone Service Available, 2000 | ![]() ![]() |
Important Confidentiality and Data Notes: the Census Bureau does not disclose any information that would permit identification of any particular establishment, individual, or household. To this end, the Census Bureau’s Disclosure Review Board uses a number of different disclosure avoidance techniques including: data-rounding, top-coding, thresholds, data suppression and other techniques. As a result, some of the data in these tables have been modified and the sum of the categories may not add to the total.
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Occupation (Part 1 of 2) | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Occupation (Part 2 of 2) | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Industry | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Class of Worker | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Place of Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence) by Earnings in 1999 | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Persons at Work in New York City by Place of Residence Persons 16 Years and Over Employed at Work During the Week Prior to Enumeration 1990 and 2000 |
![]() |
|||
New York City Residents by Place of Work Persons 16 Years and Over Employed During the Week Prior to Enumeration 1990 and 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at New York City Workplace by State and County of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at New York City Workplace by State and County of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() |
|||
Table CTPP3 P-4: New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over at Bronx Workplace (Census Tract) by New York City Borough and Census Tract of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() |
|||
Table CTPP3 P-4: New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over at Brooklyn Workplace (Census Tract) by New York City Borough and Census Tract of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work Parts 1 & 2 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
Table CTPP3 P-4: New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over at Manhattan Workplace (Census Tract) by New York City Borough and Census Tract of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work Parts 1, 2 & 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Table CTPP3 P-4: New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over at Queens Workplace (Census Tract) by New York City Borough and Census Tract of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() |
|||
Table CTPP3 P-4: New York City Resident Workers 16 Years and Over at Staten Island Workplace (Census Tract) by New York City Borough and Census Tract of Residence by Means of Transportation to Work | ![]() |
Maps of selected Census characteristics provide information on the distribution of a specific characteristic. For example, the number of children below the poverty line is mapped for all 2,217 census tracts in New York City.
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Change in Total Population, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
![]() |
||
White Nonhispanics by Census Tract, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Black Nonhispanics by Census Tract, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Hispanics by Census Tract, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Asian Nonhispanics by Census Tract, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Multiracial Nonhispanics by Census Tract, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Puerto Ricans, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Dominicans, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Mexicans, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Ecuadorians, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Colombians, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Chinese, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Asian Indians, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Koreans, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Filipinos, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Pakistanis, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Japanese, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Number of Bangladeshis, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Percent Change in Total Population, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Change in White Nonhispanics, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Change in Black Nonhispanics, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Change in Hispanics, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Change in Asian and Pacific Islander Nonhispanics, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Change in Number of Housing Units, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Percent Change in Number of Housing Units, 1990 to 2000 | ![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
College Graduates as a Percent of the Population 25 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Percent of the Population 25 Years and Over with less than a High School Diploma, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Median Household Income in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Median Family Income in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Persons Below the Poverty Level in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Percent of Persons Below the Poverty Level in 1999, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Persons 5 Years and Over who Speak a Language Other than English at Home, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Persons 5 Years and
Over who do not Speak English "very well",
2000 |
![]() |
|||
Total Foreign-born Population, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Foreign-born Population
Arriving Between 1990 and 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Arab Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
English Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting German Ancestry, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Greek Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Haitian Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting Irish Ancestry, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Italian Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting Jamaican Ancestry, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Polish Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population
Reporting Russian Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Subsaharan Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
|||
Population Reporting
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Ancestry, 2000 |
![]() |
NYC & Boroughs | Census Tracts | Community Districts | Other Geographies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Workers Who Live in the New York Metropolitan Region (outside New York City) and Work in New York City Persons 16 Years and Over, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
New York City Residents Who Work Outside New York City Persons 16 Years and Over with Workplace in Counties in the New York Metropolitan Region, 2000 | ![]() |
|||
Total Workers 16 Years and Over at Work in New York City (Regardless of Residence), 2000 | ![]() |
Geographic notes providing essential information for effective use of the data.
Analytical Reports providing more in-depth review of selected Census subjects
Geographic Area | Total Population | Population Change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 2000 | 1990 to 2000 | ||||
City and Borough | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
New York City | 7,322,564 | 100.0 | 8,008,278 | 100.0 | 685,714 | 9.4 |
Bronx | 1,203,789 | 16.4 | 1,332,650 | 16.6 | 128,861 | 10.7 |
Brooklyn | 2,300,664 | 31.4 | 2,465,326 | 30.8 | 164,662 | 7.2 |
Manhattan | 1,487,536 | 20.3 | 1,537,195 | 19.2 | 49,659 | 3.3 |
Queens | 1,951,598 | 26.7 | 2,229,379 | 27.8 | 277,781 | 14.2 |
Staten Island | 378,977 | 5.2 | 443,728 | 5.5 | 64,751 | 17.1 |
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population of New York City as of April 1, 2000, was 8,008,278, the largest enumerated census population in the city's history. The previous peak was in 1970, when the enumerated population stood at 7,894,862.
Between 1990 and 2000, the city's enumerated population grew by 685,714 persons or 9.4 percent over the 1990 count of 7,322,564. This increase is a result of both a real increase in the city's population as well as improved census coverage compared to 1990. While the population enumerated in 1990 was 7,322,564, city planners using estimates of undercounts from the Census Bureau estimated the actual population at that time to be in the range of 7.57 million. Thus, a more realistic picture of actual growth over the decade is approximately 440,000 persons or around 6 percent.
Immigration played a crucial role in the population increase over the decade, with nearly 1.2 million immigrants admitted to New York City in the 1990s. This high level of immigration has, to a large extent, countered a substantial net outflow of residents to other parts of the nation. At the same time, a high level of births in the 1990s and fewer deaths, added substantial numbers to the population. With more than 1.266 million births and 682,000 deaths, the level of natural increase totaled 584,000. The increasing share of immigrants in the city, who tend to be younger on average than other residents, is largely responsible for the high level of natural increase.
The record population count in 2000 is also the result of an unprecedented partnership with the Census Bureau, where the City of New York provided the Census Bureau with a list of 370,000 addresses that were missing from their address list, which was to be used to mail census questionnaires and follow-up on non-responding households. As a result, most of these households, who would otherwise have not received a questionnaire or field follow-up (and who may have been missed in 1990) were included in the census enumeration. Net undercount (the difference between persons missed and erroneous enumeration) was close to zero in 2000 (see discussion below).
Staten Island grew by 64,751 people in the 1990s, reaching 443,728 in 2000. This represents a growth rate of 17.1 percent, higher than any other borough. Queens exceeded the 2 million mark for the first time in a census, with a population of 2,229,379 in 2000, a growth of 14.2 percent over 1990. The absolute increase in Queens (277,781) accounted for 40 percent of the growth in the city. The Bronx increased by a higher-than-city average of 10.7 percent over the decade, reaching 1,332,650 in 2000, while Manhattan's population stood at 1,537,195 in 2000, an increase of 3.3 percent. Brooklyn saw its population climb to 2,465,326 in 2000, and increase of 164,662 over 1990, or 7.2 percent. The increase in Brooklyn's population accounted for nearly one-quarter of the growth in the city.
In 2000, Brooklyn remained the largest borough, accounting for 30.8 percent of the city's population, followed by Queens (27.8 percent), Manhattan (19.2 percent), the Bronx (16.6 percent), and Staten Island (5.5 percent). Between 1970, the prior peak in the City's population, and 2000, there has been a shift in the population from the Bronx and Brooklyn, to Queens and Staten Island. The population of Manhattan has been essentially unchanged during this period.
In 1990, respondents had to choose from one of five racial designations: white; black; American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut; Asian or Pacific Islander; and Other race. In addition, respondents were asked whether or not they were of Hispanic origin. In our 1990 tabulations, we listed six mutually exclusive race/Hispanic groups: five race categories tabulated only for nonhispanics, and a sixth category for all Hispanics.
In 2000, to acknowledge the increasing number of Americans with more than one race, census respondents were permitted to check more than one race. Asians and Pacific Islanders were each listed separately, and respondents could check one or more of the following six race categories: white; black; American Indian and Alaska native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; and Some other race. The various race combinations yield a total of 63 race categories. Respondents were also asked if they were of Hispanic origin.
Thus in 2000, there are 64 mutually exclusive race/Hispanic categories available: 63 race categories tabulated only for nonhispanics, and a 64th category for all Hispanics. This poses a dilemma for those attempting to keep 2000 Census tabulations manageable. It also complicates attempts to evaluate change in racial/Hispanic composition of areas in the 1990-2000 period. Given that these data will be used for a variety of purposes, our approach provides both simplicity and flexibility to users. The categories for Table PL-1A show data for seven major mutually exclusive single race/Hispanic groups, plus a separate category for nonhispanic persons of two or more races. To assist persons who wish to recode categories for specific applications, Table PL-2A is presented, with details on the composition of nonhispanics of two or more races.
The city was even more racially and ethnically diverse in 2000. Among those of a single race, white nonhispanics remained the largest group, accounting for 35 percent (2.80 million) of the city's population, while for the first time in a census, Hispanics were the largest minority group, with a 27 percent share (2.16 million). Among others of a single race, black nonhispanics comprised 24.5 percent (1.96 million), and nearly 1-in-10 New Yorkers (783,000) was Asian and Pacific Islander nonhispanic. Those with a multiracial nonhispanic background accounted for 2.8 percent (225,000) of the population.
While the definition of Hispanic was consistent in 1990 and 2000, racial categories are not strictly comparable given the new multiracial designation in 2000. We thus use a high and low estimate while presenting change in a group's population between 1990 and 2000. The low estimate for black nonhispanics for example, compares black nonhispanics in 1990 with nonhispanics in 2000 who only checked off black. The high estimate compares black nonhispanics in 1990 with nonhispanics who checked off only black (single race) or checked off black in addition to any other race (multiracial).
The numerical and percentage growth of the various race/Hispanic groups between 1990 and 2000 was as follows:
For more information on high and low estimates for nonhispanic race groups, please see www.census.gov.
Given the changes in race categories, it is difficult to precisely assess how the race/Hispanic composition of an area changed between 1990 and 2000. It is important to recognize that no algorithm will ever provide us with the data necessary to make an accurate comparison between the race/Hispanic categories of the city in 1990 and 2000. In an attempt to help those who need to make an evaluation of race/Hispanic change, however, Table PL-3A presents a set of categories for 1990 and 2000 that can be used to look at racial/Hispanic change in very broad terms. This scheme includes the multiracial group in 2000 as an additional additive category, a "slice of the race/Hispanic pie" that is being newly acknowledged for 2000. As such, changes between 1990 and 2000 in any of the single race categories should be interpreted carefully, taking into account the multi-racial category in 2000.
NYC 2000: Results from the 2000 Census, is a
series of reports that highlights key findings from
the 2000 Census for New York City and its neighborhoods.
Population Growth and Race/Hispanic Composition (4.1 mb): Largely based on data from the PL 94-171 Redistricting
File, this report provides some important context for
the City's 2000 Census numbers, including historical
information on race/Hispanic composition and population
changes in other major U.S. cities. This report (DCP
#01-11) is also available in printed form in the City
Planning Bookstore.
Demographic/Household
Characteristics & Asian and Hispanic Subgroups (4.4 mb):
Largely based on data from the SF1 File, this report
provides demographic information, such as age, household
and family type, living arrangements, and housing information
by tenure for the city overall and for each borough.
It also provides information on population counts and
settlement patterns for the major Hispanic and Asian
subgroups. (DCP #02-07)
Socioeconomic
Characteristics - Overview of New York City and Boroughs,
2000 (0.4 mb): Analysis of socioeconomic characteristics such as income,
poverty and nativity based on data from the Summary
File 3 profile.
The issue of whether to adjust the 2000 Census for undercount (and overcount) was the subject of intense public debate over the past four years. The Census Bureau spent enormous resources in an effort to reach a well-founded scientific conclusion on whether their methods could be used to adjust the census for redistricting and other purposes not related to reapportionment. (The Supreme Court prohibited the use of adjustment for the purposes of reapportionment in 1999). In the end, the results of their research were too inconclusive to recommend adjustment because the unanswered questions introduced enough “reasonable doubt” to call the accuracy of adjustment into question. Therefore, none of the 2000 census data presented here or in any Census Bureau product have been adjusted for undercount or overcount.
The Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Policy at the Census Bureau was responsible for studying the issue of adjustment. On March 1, 2001, this group of senior statisticians and demographers recommended to the Director of the Census Bureau that adjustments for undercount and overcount not be incorporated into the redistricting data files. The Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E) program could not conclude, with a high level of certainty, that the adjusted census results would be more accurate than the unadjusted results by the April 1, 2001 legally-mandated deadline for release of the PL 94-171 redistricting data files. This recommendation was endorsed by Commerce Secretary Donald Evans on March 6, 2001. (The A.C.E. survey was conducted after the census on a national sample of households to determine who was counted and who was missed in the decennial census.)
Subsequent analysis of the adjustment issue by the Census Bureau was conducted to evaluate the utility of using adjusted data for purposes not related to redistricting, including future 2000 Census products, post-censal population estimates and control totals for future surveys. On October 17, 2001 the Census Bureau released A.C.E. Revised estimates and announced that it would use unadjusted census data for these purposes. Their analysis revealed that the A.C.E. survey overstated the net undercount by at least 3 million people, effectively compromising the accuracy of any census adjustment based on the survey. This error was traced most closely to the failure of A.C.E. to accurately account for erroneous enumerations in the census, many of which were duplicates. Unlike the earlier figure of 3.3 million or 1.2 percent net undercount, the national net undercount was determined to be near zero (.06 percent). In March of 2003, the A.C.E. Revision II estimates were released. This initiative further refined the methods used to determine census omissions and erroneous enumerations. The figures issued under A.C.E. Revision II have now determined that there was a net national overcount of approximately 1.3 million persons or 0.5 percent. Also, as part of Revision II, the Census Bureau determined that adjusted numbers will not be used as part of their intercensal estimates program because too many questions about the quality of the data remain, especially at a subnational level.
There are several important issues to note. First, the overcount of 1.3 million persons is a net figure, the result of close to 6 million persons erroneously enumerated and 4.7 million persons omitted, for a total of close to 11 million gross errors. (Since there is often disagreement about what to count as a gross error, the 11 million may be viewed as approximate and dependent on the definition used.) Second, a small undercount for the nation tells us little about undercount in hard-to-enumerate areas, such as inner cities or very rural places, or about groups whose members may have been missed and require adjustment. The Revision II estimates showed a statistically significant national net overcount of 1.13 percent for nonhispanic whites and a significant net undercount of 1.84 percent for nonhispanic blacks. Estimates for other groups were not found to be statistically different from zero. Finally, the Census Bureau seems to have better reconciled the A.C.E. estimate of undercount with an independent estimate of the national population derived from demographic analysis (i.e., estimate based on births, deaths, medicare records, immigration and emigration) in Revision II. In past censuses, independent verification of the total population has been a principal means of verifying the integrity of the national population figure. However, many questions remain about the integrity of the demographic analysis for 2000. In "The Analysis of the 2000 Census: Interim Assessment," the Panel to Review the 2000 Census at the National Academy of Sciences indicated that difficulties in accounting for all immigrants entering the nation and problems in the classification of persons by race make demographic analysis problematic, such that "...demographic analysis should not be used as a standard for evaluating the census or the A.C.E. at this time."
Estimates of undercount for New York City, based on early Census Bureau work and released by the now defunct Census Monitoring Board, at one point had the city’s undercount at 140,000 or 1.7 percent of the population. After incorporating better estimates of omissions and erroneous enumerations in Revision II, the Census Bureau has established that New York City experienced a net undercount of about 36,000 persons or 0.4 percent of the 2000 population. Since this estimate was derived from a sample, it is subject to sampling variability (i.e., sampling error). When sampling error is taking into account, the estimate of 36,000 was not significantly different from zero. While the Census Bureau will continue to work on census coverage issues in preparation for the 2010 Census, this is likely the final statement on the 2000 undercount for New York City.
New York City Population FactFinder is an interactive application where data users can create online profiles for their own customized geographic study areas.
Links to the U. S. Census Bureau for the definition of Census terms, 2000 Census questionnaires and other items.