Over the past several days there's been a great deal of discussion throughout our city about an exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. I want to take this opportunity to state my position on this very clearly, in a way that can't be misunderstood.
People have a right in America -- and I fiercely defend this right -- to
express any opinion that they want on the country, on religion, or on anything
else. That's what the First Amendment is all about.
And there's no question that living in a free society requires us to tolerate
the expression of views -- and in this case visual displays -- that we may
find abhorrent. Tolerance is an essential component to the freedom and democracy
we enjoy, and is protected by our Constitution.
But there's nothing, absolutely nothing in the Constitution that requires
you and I to pay for expressions of opinion that desecrate important and significant
national and religious symbols. The right to freedom of expression does not
entail the right to public money. The spending of public money is a public
trust and entails serious responsibility. Any institution that takes taxpayer
dollars has a responsibility to be sensitive and respectful to the thoughts
and deeply held beliefs of the people it's taking money from. Public taxpayer
dollars should not be spent on the aggressive desecration of national or religious
symbols of great significance and sensitivity to the very people who are being
required to pay for this.
For example, in this exhibit -- which includes animals cut in half and preserved
in formaldehyde -- there is a work called the "Holy Virgin Mary" which is
a collage of images from pornographic magazines smeared with elephant feces.
Although to many, including me, this is a disgusting exhibition, no one can
suppress this expression of opinion. But by the same token, the people putting
on this exhibition are not entitled to put their hands into the pockets of
taxpayers and have them support this.
The Brooklyn Museum is a public museum. It's owned by the City of New York,
which means by the people of the City of New York. And it should not be required
to have to spend public money on something that desecrates religion or things
of national significance. And this would be equally true if it was desecrating
the Jewish religion, the Muslim religion, the Protestant religion, or any
of the religions that are of great significance and importance to the people
of our city and our country.
Moreover, in showing this exhibit, the Brooklyn Museum has to also close off
part of their museum to children because they believe the exhibit would be
horrible for children to see. But closing off any part of the museum violates
the century-old lease between the museum and the City, which requires that
the museum be open for public access. The lease states that the museum "…shall
at all reasonable times be free, and open and accessible to the public and
private schools of the city, and open and accessible to the general public
on such terms of admission as the Mayor and Commissioner shall approve,…and
also that if and when the museum or the libraries connected to it shall cease
to be maintained according to the true intent and meaning of the act and the
lease, then the lease is forfeited."
Indeed, this is the very risk that the people putting on this exhibit are
taking. More than two centuries ago, Thomas Jefferson wrote that "To compel
a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which
he disbelieves is tyrannical." The distinction that many are overlooking here
is not in any way interfering in freedom of expression. People have a right
to express their views. But by the same token, people also have a right to
make certain that their taxpayer dollars do not support serious desecrations
of things that are important to them as a nation, or things that are important
to them from the point of view of their religion.
This is Mayor Rudy Giuliani