Search Email Updates Contact Us Residents Business Visitors Government Office of the Mayor NYC.gov always open
The New York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneSign up for Health Emails
Take Care New York
Submit comments about the website.
Advanced

Stay Connected
Follow us on TwitterFollow us on FacebookFollow us on TumblrView our YouTube channelFollow us on foursquare

RSS

Translate the page





















Quality Impact : NYC DOHMH

Quality IMPACT

Additional Resources
Resources: Websites

These websites are meant as general references provided for the convenience of individuals who are interested in becoming more involved in quality improvement. These websites are not endorsed or specific to Quality IMPACT. This is an incomplete list, but we expect to add additional sites over time. Feel free to email Quality IMPACT to make any additional website suggestions.

  • • Quality Indicator Project: Clinical Performance Measurement and National Comparative Databases for: Acute Care Hospitals, Psychiatric Care Facilities, Long-Term Care Facilities, and Home Care Agencies.
  • • Quality Mall is a place where you can find lots of free information about person-centered supports for people with developmental disabilities. Each of the Mall stores has departments you can look through to learn about positive practices that help people with developmental disabilities live, work and participate in our communities and improve the quality of their supports.
  • • The Council on Quality and Leadership is at the forefront of the movement to create opportunities for people to lead the lives they choose and to improve the quality of services and supports for people with disabilities and mental illness. For more than 30 years, The Council has worked to implement person-centered solutions for service and support organizations, state and national government agencies, regional systems and networks, and professionals and self-advocates. The Council is dedicated to ensuring that people with disabilities and mental illness have full and abundant lives.
  • • The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP)  website is a resource for mental health information (or data). It has information on “how to collect it, what needs to be collected, where to find what others have collected, how to understand what you find, how to report it so other people can understand it, and how to use it to make decisions. People receiving mental health services, and people managing and providing those services, often have questions about who is providing the best services at the best price, who needs services, what the best treatments are for different kinds of problems, or who has the friendliest staff. To answer any of these questions, people need dependable information.”
    “A group called the MHSIP Policy Group has been working to develop standards for mental health data for the last 20 years. It is through the efforts of this group, supported by the federal Center for Mental Health Services, and informed by people who receive mental health services, provide services, and manage services, that this manual has been developed.
  • • The Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health (CQAIMH) conducts mental health services research and provides quality management services to improve community-based care for individuals with mental health and addictions disorders. CQAIMH, consisting of faculty and staff from Tufts University School of Medicine and Harvard University, develops methods of quality assessment, studies determinants of quality, and tests strategies for quality improvement.
  • • SAMHSA is the Federal agency charged with improving the quality and availability of prevention, treatment, and rehabilitative services in order to reduce illness, death, disability, and cost to society resulting from substance abuse and mental illnesses
  • • Cultural Competence Websites: The National Center for Cultural Competence identifies six of the most salient reasons for incorporating cultural competence into organizational policy. This information may be helpful in providing a framework and sense of purpose for individual or organizational efforts to increase cultural competency.

back to top

Resources: References

These websites are meant as general references provided for the convenience of individuals who are interested in becoming more involved in quality improvement. These websites are not endorsed or specific to Quality IMPACT. This is an incomplete list, but we expect to add additional sites over time. Feel free to email Quality IMPACT to make any additional website suggestions.

  • • American Psychiatric Association. (2002). Quality Indicators: Defining and measuring quality in psychiatric care for adults and children (executive summary). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
  • • Berwick, D. (1996). Quality of health care part 5: Payment by capitation and the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (16), 1227-1231.
  • • Blumenthal, D. (1996). Quality of health care part 1: Quality of care- what is it? New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (12), 891-894.
  • • Blumenthal, D. (1996). Quality of health care part 4: The origins of the quality-of-care debate. New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (15), 1146-1149.
  • • Blumenthal, D. (1996). Quality of health care part 6: The role of physicians in the future of quality management. New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (17), 1328-1331.
  • • Brook, R., McGlynn, E., & Cleary, P. (1996). Quality of health care part 2: Measuring the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (13), 966-970.
  • • Chassin, M. (1996). Quality of health care part 3: Improving the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (14), 1060-1063.
  • • Dickey, B. & Sederer, L. (Eds.). (2001). Improving mental health care: Commitment to quality. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
  • • Durban, J. et al. (2003). Mental health program monitoring: Towards simplifying a complex task. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(3), 249-261.
  • • Fernandopulle, R., et al. (2003). A research agenda for bridging the 'quality chasm.' Health Affairs, 2 (22), 17-30.
  • • Institutes of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (executive summary). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • • Leatherman, Sheila, et al. (2003). The business case for quality: Case studies and an analysis. Health Affairs, 2 (22), 178-190.
  • • Nelson, D., Senesac, P., & Holt, W. (2001). Continuous quality improvement: Principles in behavioral healthcare. In Talbot, J., & Hales, R. (Eds.). Textbook of Administrative Psychiatry; New concepts for a changing behavioral health system. Baltimore: American Psychiatric Press.

back to top

 
Copyright 2012 The City of New York Contact Us | FAQs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map