Change in Total Population,
1990 and 2000
New York City and Boroughs
| Geographic
Area |
Total
Population |
Population
Change |
|
|
1990 |
|
2000 |
|
1990
to 2000 |
| City and Borough |
|
Number |
Percent |
|
Number |
Percent |
|
Number |
Percent |
| New York City |
|
7,322,564 |
100.0 |
|
8,008,278 |
100.0 |
|
685,714 |
9.4 |
| Bronx |
|
1,203,789 |
16.4 |
|
1,332,650 |
16.6 |
|
128,861 |
10.7 |
| Brooklyn |
|
2,300,664 |
31.4 |
|
2,465,326 |
30.8 |
|
164,662 |
7.2 |
| Manhattan |
|
1,487,536 |
20.3 |
|
1,537,195 |
19.2 |
|
49,659 |
3.3 |
| Queens |
|
1,951,598 |
26.7 |
|
2,229,379 |
27.8 |
|
277,781 |
14.2 |
| Staten
Island |
|
378,977 |
5.2 |
|
443,728 |
5.5 |
|
64,751 |
17.1 |
- CONTENTS
CITYWIDE
According to the U.S.
Census Bureau, the population of New York City as
of April 1, 2000, was 8,008,278, the largest enumerated
census population in the city's history. The previous
peak was in 1970, when the enumerated population
stood at 7,894,862.
Between 1990 and 2000, the city's enumerated population grew by 685,714 persons or 9.4 percent over the 1990 count of 7,322,564. This increase is a result of both a real increase in the city's population as well as improved census coverage compared to 1990. While the population enumerated in 1990 was 7,322,564, city planners using estimates of undercounts from the Census Bureau estimated the actual population at that time to be in the range of 7.57 million. Thus, a more realistic picture of actual growth over the decade is approximately 440,000 persons or around 6 percent.
Immigration played a crucial
role in the population increase over the decade, with
nearly 1.2 million immigrants admitted to New York
City in the 1990s. This high level of immigration has,
to a large extent, countered a substantial net outflow
of residents to other parts of the nation. At the same
time, a high level of births in the 1990s and fewer
deaths, added substantial numbers to the population.
With more than 1.266 million births and 682,000 deaths,
the level of natural increase totaled 584,000. The
increasing share of immigrants in the city, who tend
to be younger on average than other residents, is largely
responsible for the high level of natural increase.
The record population count
in 2000 is also the result of an unprecedented partnership
with the Census Bureau, where the City of New York
provided the Census Bureau with a list of 370,000 addresses
that were missing from their address list, which was
to be used to mail census questionnaires and follow-up
on non-responding households. As a result, most of these households, who would otherwise have not received a questionnaire or field follow-up (and who may have been missed in 1990) were included in the census enumeration. Net undercount (the difference between persons missed and erroneous enumeration) was close to zero in 2000 (see discussion below).
Return
to Contents
BY BOROUGH
Staten Island grew by
64,751 people in the 1990s, reaching 443,728 in 2000.
This represents a growth rate of 17.1 percent, higher
than any other borough. Queens exceeded the 2 million
mark for the first time in a census, with a population
of 2,229,379 in 2000, a growth of 14.2 percent over
1990. The absolute increase in Queens (277,781) accounted
for 40 percent of the growth in the city. The Bronx
increased by a higher-than-city average of 10.7 percent
over the decade, reaching 1,332,650 in 2000, while
Manhattan's population stood at 1,537,195 in 2000,
an increase of 3.3 percent. Brooklyn saw its population
climb to 2,465,326 in 2000, and increase of 164,662
over 1990, or 7.2 percent. The increase in Brooklyn's
population accounted for nearly one-quarter of the
growth in the city.
In 2000, Brooklyn remained the
largest borough, accounting for 30.8 percent of the
city's population, followed by Queens (27.8 percent),
Manhattan (19.2 percent), the Bronx (16.6 percent),
and Staten Island (5.5 percent). Between 1970, the
prior peak in the City's population, and 2000, there
has been a shift in the population from the Bronx and
Brooklyn, to Queens and Staten Island. The population
of Manhattan has been essentially unchanged during
this period.
Return
to Contents
POPULATION
BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN
Changes in Racial
Classification in 2000
In 1990, respondents
had to choose from one of five racial designations:
white; black; American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut; Asian
or Pacific Islander; and Other race. In addition,
respondents were asked whether or not they were of
Hispanic origin. In our 1990 tabulations, we listed
six mutually exclusive race/Hispanic groups: five
race categories tabulated only for nonhispanics,
and a sixth category for all Hispanics.
In 2000, to acknowledge the
increasing number of Americans with more than one race,
census respondents were permitted to check more than
one race. Asians and Pacific Islanders were each listed
separately, and respondents could check one or more
of the following six race categories: white; black;
American Indian and Alaska native; Asian; Native Hawaiian
and Other Pacific Islander; and Some other race. The
various race combinations yield a total of 63 race
categories. Respondents were also asked if they were
of Hispanic origin.
Thus in 2000, there are 64 mutually
exclusive race/Hispanic categories available: 63 race
categories tabulated only for nonhispanics, and a 64th
category for all Hispanics. This poses a dilemma for
those attempting to keep 2000 Census tabulations manageable.
It also complicates attempts to evaluate change in
racial/Hispanic composition of areas in the 1990-2000
period. Given that these data will be used for a variety
of purposes, our approach provides both simplicity
and flexibility to users. The categories for Table
PL-1A show data for seven major mutually exclusive
single race/Hispanic groups, plus a separate category
for nonhispanic persons of two or more races. To assist
persons who wish to recode categories for specific
applications, Table PL-2A is presented, with details
on the composition of nonhispanics of two or more races.
Racial/Hispanic Profile
in 2000
The city was even more racially
and ethnically diverse in 2000. Among those of a single
race, white nonhispanics remained the largest group,
accounting for 35 percent (2.80 million) of the city's
population., while for the first time in a census,
Hispanics were the largest minority group, with a 27
percent share (2.16 million). Among others of a single
race, Black nonhispanics comprised 24.5 percent (1.96
million), and nearly 1-in-10 New Yorkers (783,000)
was Asian and Pacific Islander nonhispanic. Those with
a multiracial nonhispanic background accounted for
2.8 percent (225,000) of the population.
While the definition of Hispanic
was consistent in 1990 and 2000, racial categories
are not strictly comparable given the new multiracial
designation in 2000. We thus use a high and low estimate
while presenting change in a group's population between
1990 and 2000. The low estimate for black nonhispanics
for example, compares black nonhispanics in 1990 with
nonhispanics in 2000 who only checked off black. The
high estimate compares black nonhispanics in 1990 with
nonhispanics who checked off only black (single race)
or checked off black in addition to any other race
(multiracial).
The numerical and percentage
growth of the various race/Hispanic groups between
1990 and 2000 was as follows:
- Black nonhispanic:
an increase of 115,105 to 195,262, or between 6.2
and 10.6 percent
- Asian and
Pacific Islanders nonhispanic: an increase of 293,207
to 370,160, or between 59.9 and 75.6 percent
- Hispanic
(unchanged definition in 1990 and 2000): an increase
of 377,043 or 21.1 percent
- White nonhispanic:
decline between 257,750 to 361,858, or -8.1 to
-11.4 percent
For more information on
high and low estimates for nonhispanic race groups,
please see www.census.gov.
Given the changes in race categories,
it is difficult to precisely assess how the race/Hispanic
composition of an area changed between 1990 and 2000.
It is important to recognize that no algorithm will
ever provide us with the data necessary to make an
accurate comparison between the race/Hispanic categories
of the city in 1990 and 2000. In an attempt to help
those who need to make an evaluation of race/Hispanic
change, however, Table PL-3A presents a set of categories
for 1990 and 2000 that can be used to look at racial/Hispanic
change in very broad terms. This scheme includes the
multiracial group in 2000 as an additional additive
category, a "slice of the race/Hispanic pie" that is
being newly acknowledged for 2000. As such, changes
between 1990 and 2000 in any of the single race categories
should be interpreted carefully, taking into account
the multi-racial category in 2000.
Return
to Contents
|